Home | Networks | Community | Need Help? 

 
 Quick search

 
 
 RegisterRegister   Log inLog in 

Stupid Question...

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SearchIRC Forum Index -> IRC Help
Author Message
LIQUID_NiTrO
none
none


Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Apr 10, 2004 2:50pm    Post subject: Stupid Question... Reply with quote

Most people will probably consider this an extremely newbish question, but after 3 years of being a global oper, I still cannot figure it out:

Why AKILL someone rather than G:LINE?
What's the difference?
Back to top
uchat
Idler
Idler


Joined: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 335

PostPosted: Apr 10, 2004 5:04pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

not all IRCd's support akill ... not all support G:Lines ... but they both are still network bans.
Back to top
U
Eleet
Eleet


Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 521
Location: IRC

PostPosted: Apr 10, 2004 6:05pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Akill is normally a services function, ie services will 'autokill' someone added to them.

Gline is the actual line used in the server that bans the person.

When services issues an autokill, it adds a gline to the server for that person.
Back to top
uchat
Idler
Idler


Joined: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 335

PostPosted: Apr 10, 2004 6:22pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

G:Lines are also added by Services bots at times.

G:Lines are global (which is what the G stands for) just as an akill is. Functionally there no difference between the 2 commands.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Apr 10, 2004 9:00pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Historically, AKILLs and G:lines were different. Some IRCds had AKILLs, some had G:lines. None really had both. AKILLs were pretty simplistic, global permanent bans. G:lines often offered more flexibility by specifying an expire time. Today, G:lines are pretty much all that are left. Sure, services has an AKILL command and most IRCds do as well, but internally it is just a G:line. In Unreal for example, when services sends an AKILL command it translates it to a G:line and sends the G:line out to every other server on the network rather than the AKILL. The AKILL/RAKILL commands are maintained only for backwards compatibility.
Back to top
uchat
Idler
Idler


Joined: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 335

PostPosted: Apr 11, 2004 8:07am    Post subject: Reply with quote

akills also supports an expire time and have for many years. So my statement that they are functionally the same remains. There is a few differences between the way they act. What differences there is, is nothing more than semantics. Long story short ... they are both a timed global ban.

You use past tense terms as if the AKILL is dead, and it is not. it survives as well as it always has. I've use both through my many years and I have found that I like them both the same and have no preference as to which is better.
Back to top
LIQUID_NiTrO
none
none


Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Apr 11, 2004 8:49am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK I was just wondering because in the IRC Abuse forum everyone always says "AKILL bots..." or "AKILL script kiddies..." etc etc rather than G:line...
just seems kinda odd to me i guess Confused
Back to top
Julia
none
none


Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Jun 30, 2004 10:21pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Akills are mostly services managed stuff (expiration times etc) its in DALnet style
G:line's are UnderNet style and expire time is measured by IRCD itself instead
of giving it to services.
My Network using both of them. Which one to prefer - let the opers choose, they mostly use G-Lines (i dont know why)
Back to top
katsklaw
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1098

PostPosted: Jul 01, 2004 6:35am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LIQUID_NiTrO wrote:
OK I was just wondering because in the IRC Abuse forum everyone always says "AKILL bots..." or "AKILL script kiddies..." etc etc rather than G:line...
just seems kinda odd to me i guess Confused


Although there is a technical difference between an akill and a G:Line .. there is very little noticable difference as far as functionality goes.

If a person was an IRCop on DALnet and never went to any other nets ... then that oper may not have heard of a G:Line and vice versa on nets that never used akill .... so generally speaking they are the same thing .. a network ban. In other words .. pure semantics.
Back to top
Ashen
Idler
Idler


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 285

PostPosted: Jul 03, 2004 3:37pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've been using akills for a long time, and I'm tempted towards gline for one simple reason : glines don't require as much to work.

Specifically, they work when services are split (rare, but happens) and they can be set by any oper of your choice, not just services (which is important, when you want to control oper access on a more fine-tuned level, and when you want to run something like a proxy killer, which works much better with glines then with akills).

-Ashen
Back to top
Julia
none
none


Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Jul 11, 2004 11:47am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Disagree about that akill need services Smile
there is old good /akill /rakill combo (DreamForge IRCD family)
It works (on some ircd modifications for server admins only) without services.
So its only matter of style as i said Cool
Back to top
katsklaw
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1098

PostPosted: Jul 11, 2004 12:28pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ashen wrote:
I've been using akills for a long time, and I'm tempted towards gline for one simple reason : glines don't require as much to work.

[...]

-Ashen


Please explain to me how adding a G:Line is so much less work than adding an akill?

They both are a single command. On some nets the akill command uses LESS information than that of an average G:Line and yet some other IRCd's they are the exact same syntax. So how is that less work?
Back to top
Ashen
Idler
Idler


Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 285

PostPosted: Jul 11, 2004 7:27pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

glines don't require services to be online, or you to have services operator access.
akills do.

glines are also enforced by the ircd, so can be easily changed even when services are down.

This is why I prefer ircd-based glines....... they're the same amount of work to add (re-read my post, you misinterpreted it)..... but glines seem to me better because unlike akills your use of them can't be disrupted by services downtime. (I am aware of glines set by the services akill command, and count them as akills not glines, 'glines' to me are global klines set by the /gline command without the use of services).

-Ashen
Back to top
katsklaw
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1098

PostPosted: Jul 11, 2004 8:32pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ashen wrote:
glines don't require services to be online, or you to have services operator access.
akills do.

glines are also enforced by the ircd, so can be easily changed even when services are down.


So can akills .. ever heard of /akill and /rakill ? (as opposed to /operserv akill)
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SearchIRC Forum Index -> IRC Help All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
 
Forum powered by phpBB
 
 © 2000 - 2008 EverythingIRC, Inc. All rights reserved. Please read our disclaimer