|
|
| Author |
Message |
nenolod Idler

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 335 Location: A box!
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2004 5:53pm Post subject: Network consolidation effort |
|
|
There are thousands of tiny networks on IRC. I think it's time an effort was established to consolidate the networks forming a larger network.
There are some principals of this endeavor that I must state however.
First, every entity involved in this effort is equal. Nobody will be dominant over the amount of users or servers they have on their network.
Second, quality over quantity is what matters. The behaviour of the users matter, not the quantity of the users/servers. Abuse cannot be tolerated.
Third, everyone has to agree on the issues before anything happens. At present, this is only a discussion to see who might be interested in working on such an initiative.
I have preferences toward EFnet ircd's (hybrid, ratbox, csircd) and DALnet ircd's (bahamut, NOT dreamforge). Unreal may be considered if valid arguments are made. (The services argument does not work. Services can be ported.)
At present, the network I am on runs a modified version of hybrid-7.0.1 called ShadowIRCd... again, this would also be a preference on my part.
None the less however, the software and policies involved would have to be voted on and discussed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nenolod Idler

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 335 Location: A box!
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2004 5:55pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh one more thing. Please note that this is not a request to be taken over by a larger network. That is not my intention. (I do not take kindly to hostile takeover attempts.)
I have also set up a forum that can be explicitly used for discussing this at http://www.nenolod.net/phpBB2/  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
uchat Idler

Joined: 17 Mar 2004 Posts: 335
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2004 6:06pm Post subject: |
|
|
| how would this differ from a merger? (which I'm sure most would not want) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nenolod Idler

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 335 Location: A box!
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2004 6:09pm Post subject: |
|
|
A merger would involve being swallowed up into a larger network... i.e. their is a dominant group involved.
Under this scheme, everything would be started out from the beginning. The goal here is to make a network with solid philosophies and staff behind it's operation.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nenolod Idler

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 335 Location: A box!
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2004 6:11pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Oh, one last thing too... anyone interested can contact me via IRC @ irc.nenolod.net. Just ask around for nenolod. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
uchat Idler

Joined: 17 Mar 2004 Posts: 335
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2004 6:32pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like the "starting fresh" idea .. but IMHO people that start networks do so because they are unhappy with the net they are on. Mebbe it's a power thing ... mebbe no one can decide what software to use ... what policies to enforce. This way the person starting the network can do what they feel is right.
I'm not opposing your idea, just concerned of it's outcome. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nenolod Idler

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 335 Location: A box!
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2004 6:47pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Like i said, there are presently problems on the network I am involved with and as of late it has gone to chaos, therefore i think it might be good to start new with determined policies and software. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
uchat Idler

Joined: 17 Mar 2004 Posts: 335
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2004 6:58pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Perhaps the irc-ag would be interested in this idea. I feel they may need a centralized place to gather. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nenolod Idler

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 335 Location: A box!
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2004 8:22pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Contact me in #newnet on irc.nenolod.net, that's where i think we will be discussing this endeavour... also pass that on to anyone else who might be interested. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
U Eleet

Joined: 18 Jun 2003 Posts: 521 Location: IRC
|
Posted: Mar 27, 2004 8:53am Post subject: |
|
|
This isn't a new concept, and since you're the one with the idea, I would guess you would be the one in overall control.
In that case, its still a merger. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nenolod Idler

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 335 Location: A box!
|
Posted: Mar 27, 2004 12:21pm Post subject: |
|
|
Incorrect. I dont want control of any of this... control would have to be spread equally...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Horizon Lurker

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 145 Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
|
Posted: Mar 27, 2004 12:32pm Post subject: |
|
|
With network policy's being vastly different from network to network.. I feel there would be no real way for everyone to come to a concencus as to what network policy would be and the direction to take the network.
U is right, this is not a new idea and it will never work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
uchat Idler

Joined: 17 Mar 2004 Posts: 335
|
Posted: Mar 27, 2004 1:30pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 60 years ago breaking the sound barrier wouldn't work either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Horizon Lurker

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 145 Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
|
Posted: Mar 27, 2004 1:56pm Post subject: |
|
|
| uchat wrote: | | 60 years ago breaking the sound barrier wouldn't work either. |
lol.. please PLEASE dont tell me your comparing IRC to the sound barrier... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
uchat Idler

Joined: 17 Mar 2004 Posts: 335
|
Posted: Mar 27, 2004 2:14pm Post subject: |
|
|
| no, I was refering to the closed minded "will not work" comment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|