|
|
| Author |
Message |
Michael none

Joined: 18 May 2003 Posts: 48
|
Posted: Jan 11, 2004 12:34am Post subject: Requiring IDENTD: What's your stance on it? |
|
|
I know some networks require identd, and I understand why that might be. The problem is, some ISP's (like mine I think) are blocking port 113, making identd unusable, and therefore the person cannot connect to the network.
Do you require it, and why/why not? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moonman Lurker

Joined: 15 Jul 2003 Posts: 212
|
Posted: Jan 11, 2004 2:17am Post subject: |
|
|
| i dont, because i have problems getting it to work on my computer sometimes and i dont expect everyone else to enable something that i cant half the time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
U Eleet

Joined: 18 Jun 2003 Posts: 521 Location: IRC
|
Posted: Jan 11, 2004 10:43am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't simply because of the havoc it can create.
I have roughly 1000 users on my network. The only way to successfully eradicate identd is via akill or kline.
So this means someone with identd connects, tries to get in, is found to have identd, and then gets killed. This burns up only a small smidge of bandwith, but if they have auto reconnect set, they could do this a few times before realising it and terminating the connect attempt.
Lets multiply this by however many thousand users a day are trying to connect. So now I'm burning bandwidth and not even getting users out of it, I'm just tossing people off.
Lets also add that, ok, true, alot of spambots and 'bad' stuff use servers without identd, but hey, lets be honest-if someone really wants to spam IRC networks, they will install identd. Alot of users don't because of the previous post-too lazy, or heck, don't know how and don't CARE to know how-they just want on IRC to talk to their buddy, get mp3's, whatever.
Thus, I don't run it. Networks that do don't seem to be too hurt by it, but I have also had people tell me they appreciate it not being blocked, since some shell providers don't install it either.
It does block some abuse, don't get me wrong-but if you think it will block everything, it won't, definetely. Also, since you can't block non-identd by zline (ie the server would just ignore it), you're still going to burn some bandwith to tell those clients to install it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gtpnos Newbie

Joined: 05 Aug 2003 Posts: 67 Location: USA
|
Posted: Jan 11, 2004 3:06pm Post subject: |
|
|
IdentD's real purpose was from my understanding not to allow you to fake your userid forcing you to use the local servers identd server which unless you were root you couldn't change without running your own. Since running your own identd server is possibly and comes pretty much stock with various IRC clients it doesn't serve a purpose anymore. On my servers I always had the ident checker but that's as far as it would go, it wouldn't actually remove you since you would run into the same bandwidth situation as U has mentioned. It's really pointless anymore.
-gtpnos |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason SearchIRC Developer

Joined: 03 May 2003 Posts: 1197 Location: Tampa, FL
|
Posted: Jan 11, 2004 6:08pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The purpose of ident on IRC is to identify individual users on a multi-user system. For example: A university server or a shell server that has several users (usually at the same time). Without ident, you cannot tell one from the other, as the host is the same for all users. Thus the only way to ban one user, would be to ban them all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Michael none

Joined: 18 May 2003 Posts: 48
|
Posted: Jan 11, 2004 6:51pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hold on, hold on. I'm talking about identd, like that of the "Identd" section in the mIRC config.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason SearchIRC Developer

Joined: 03 May 2003 Posts: 1197 Location: Tampa, FL
|
Posted: Jan 11, 2004 7:55pm Post subject: |
|
|
| So are we :) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gtpnos Newbie

Joined: 05 Aug 2003 Posts: 67 Location: USA
|
Posted: Jan 11, 2004 10:35pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jason wrote: | | The purpose of ident on IRC is to identify individual users on a multi-user system. For example: A university server or a shell server that has several users (usually at the same time). Without ident, you cannot tell one from the other, as the host is the same for all users. Thus the only way to ban one user, would be to ban them all. |
that said is true, that's the concept of identd, but since anyone can run their own identd server is no longer serves a legitiment purpose. I believe some of the larger network servers deny non-identd clients, but then again those are the servers that pretty much deny everyone since they're full all the time. I can't see anyone denying non-identd users today thinking that it's doing anything positive. It comes handy in the small percentage of shell providers that allow irc'ing or bouncers were only a limited group of people have root access, but then again, nobody would probably notice if you just banned the shell provider :wink:
-gtpnos |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Michael none

Joined: 18 May 2003 Posts: 48
|
Posted: Jan 12, 2004 3:10pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alright, Jason
My thoughts: I don't think identd ought to be required basically for the reason I've already said - many ISPs are blocking port 113, and that sort of makes identd a useless program. So, basically what everybody else has said so far. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gtpnos Newbie

Joined: 05 Aug 2003 Posts: 67 Location: USA
|
Posted: Jan 12, 2004 3:39pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Michael wrote: | Alright, Jason
My thoughts: I don't think identd ought to be required basically for the reason I've already said - many ISPs are blocking port 113, and that sort of makes identd a useless program. So, basically what everybody else has said so far. |
That's completly true, ISPs are blocking more ports now-a-days and with that comes that problem of getting connected. Not to mention Requring IdentD on home computers is pointless, it only comes into real play on shell accounts or IRC proxys, other then that, I really can't imagine networks that want users and that don't have an overcrowding issue blocking non-identd clients,
peace
-gtpnos |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ashen Guest Guest
|
Posted: Jan 17, 2004 1:05pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm a shell provider admin and I mandate identd be installed on all my hosts, simply because without it, one rogue user can get my entire address space glined by doing bad things and changing his ident repeatedly until the ircops of said network get fed up enough to just block my entire IP range.
Identd is irrelavant for home computers, but it's vital for shells and unix/linux/bsd users. It also helps networks fight clonebots......as few bots run their own identd server while they are connecting.
-Ashen |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
U Eleet

Joined: 18 Jun 2003 Posts: 521 Location: IRC
|
Posted: Jan 17, 2004 2:19pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can do that WITH identd, by the way (change idents). All having identd does is prevent the ~ from appearing on the front.
Unless you lock the accounts down where the only ident can be the userid, then you're good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MotherOfSamantha none

Joined: 23 Feb 2004 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mar 05, 2004 3:34pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ident on linux is a bitch to set up at least for myself. This is why my irc server doesnt make poeple use ident. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Horizon Lurker

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 145 Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
uchat Idler

Joined: 17 Mar 2004 Posts: 335
|
Posted: May 08, 2004 8:09pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
All having identd does is prevent the ~ from appearing on the front.
|
This is true for the mIRC users. Windows identd is a huge joke. Anyone can manipulate their own response.
*nix on the other hand is totally different. Users can't manipulate their ident response unless the admin allows it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|