|
|
| Author |
Message |
Sailirc
none
Joined: 12 Sep 2004
Posts: 30
|
 Posted: Jan 05, 2008 10:58pm Post subject: irc services |
 |
|
| we still run ircservices, I guess its hard to change. I installed anope once and it did not feel right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mjgreen
none
Joined: 23 Mar 2008
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Mar 23, 2008 7:43pm Post subject: Re: epona |
|
|
| Celestial-Essences wrote: | | epona was good but it's no longer developed. |
Au contraire, they've just released a new version complete with full MySQL support.
Sadly they don't support hybrid.
| Arabian wrote: | | Very interesting, I would love to see a big network using it with Live MySQL, do you know any? |
blitzed.org - its their own fork of ircservices AFAIK designed for their version of bahamut.
Personally, I currently use a version of anope, with modules added to hybrid to fully support services & stuff added to anope to support those commands & various stuff ripped out that we don't need.
Used epona before that & auspice before epona (before we changed to hybrid) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ButtaKnife
none
Joined: 26 Apr 2005
Posts: 38
|
| Posted: Mar 25, 2008 1:39pm Post subject: |
|
|
| We have been very impressed with X3 and Nefarious IRCu. The srvx foundation for X3 is extremely efficient, and the additions and modifications that the Evilnet crew have put into X3 are very nice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Liam
none
Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 38
Location: South Shields, UK
|
| Posted: Jun 23, 2008 9:49am Post subject: |
|
|
| I personally use anope, although I have used atheme in the past but various things made me switch back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
w00t
Eleet
Joined: 09 Jun 2004
Posts: 699
Location: Nowra, Australia
|
| Posted: Jul 15, 2008 6:34am Post subject: |
|
|
| Liam wrote: | | I personally use anope, although I have used atheme in the past but various things made me switch back. |
I'd be interested as to what those are, as I'm one of the developers. 
(sidenote: 3.2 is now open for dev, one planned feature is sticky +eI lists, hooray.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PingBad
Guru
Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 2075
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Jul 15, 2008 6:39am Post subject: |
|
|
after fiddling around some with atheme, I actually quite like some of the features it provides. As it happens, I'm currently planning a network of my own (financial resources permitting) complete with web front-end that integrate with services in a real-time manner, and I am seriously considering using atheme to accomplish the task.
Cudos to the devs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SecretAgent
none
Joined: 13 May 2003
Posts: 3
Location: California
|
| Posted: Jul 15, 2008 6:01pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with a few others, atheme has some fairly nice features, but, in all, not my cup of tea. Personally, I prefer X3. A complete, yet powerful package for P10-based ircds. I'm currently working on something like srvx's mod-qserver, among a few other things, for X3 to help facilitate real-time web-integration.
......
and five years after signing up i decide to finally post something to the forums ;p |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mouselike
Idler
Joined: 09 Dec 2003
Posts: 261
|
| Posted: Jul 16, 2008 11:07am Post subject: |
|
|
| atheme is one of the best irc services packages i've seen to hand, infact the ability to get rid of nickserv to some point (yes i know userserv is a stripped down nickserv) makes it a nice addition to those networks that just want a basic auth system with a channel service. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jobe
Idler
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 376
Location: Lurking in the shadows of some random channel!
|
| Posted: Jul 16, 2008 11:15am Post subject: |
|
|
| SecretAgent wrote: | I agree with a few others, atheme has some fairly nice features, but, in all, not my cup of tea. Personally, I prefer X3. A complete, yet powerful package for P10-based ircds. I'm currently working on something like srvx's mod-qserver, among a few other things, for X3 to help facilitate real-time web-integration.
......
and five years after signing up i decide to finally post something to the forums ;p |
I agree X3 is a pretty darn powerful package, and hell, if you know what you're doing, without modifying the source, you can set it up to run as a single bot services. Or even just a small number of bots like just OperServ and X3
As for non-P10 IRCd's, I prefer Anope. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dagorath
none
Joined: 06 Jan 2007
Posts: 7
|
| Posted: Jul 31, 2008 6:50pm Post subject: |
|
|
Based on the services packages I've run on my test servers, I have to say Anope seems to be about the most useful. Active modules community, active forum community - these are dealmakers.
And it may sound fickle, but HostServ is tremendously popular with users. As are several of the modules available for Anope. For an "out of the box" network with intent to grow into something bigger, better, and eventually at the very least heavily customized, Anope is a great way to show your users what you -will- be giving them in the future.
It's also well worth looking at the IRC services package comparison article on Wikipedia - just glancing at this shows that Anope is typically more feature-rich (and it's widespread use is proof of general stability, AFAIC). If you can't find said article, er, you're going to have problems running a network anyway...
And as a sidenote...
I hate to say it (except I don't, really), but if you can't code, and none of your staff can code, you probably shouldn't be running an IRC network. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| |
Register
Log in
