Home | Networks | Community | Need Help? 

 
 Quick search

 
 
 RegisterRegister   Log inLog in 

new network?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SearchIRC Forum Index -> Help Wanted
Author Message
pawlicki
none
none


Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Posts: 27

PostPosted: Nov 24, 2007 7:44pm    Post subject: new network? Reply with quote

i'm just tossing out an idea here...

i noticed many people have their boxes which host for some irc networks using ports approx. 6600-7000.

Would anybody be interested in linking a few boxes on non-standard ports, such as 9990-9999, and making a new irc network?

I have a machine that could do it, and would be happy to start if people wanted to join.

Maybe even allow wildcard server linking? (like eris used to Smile
Back to top
ircmojo
Lurker
Lurker


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 215
Location: $HOME sweet $HOME

PostPosted: Nov 24, 2007 9:30pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

why? Don't you think there is already enough "hey lets just throw together a few ircds because we can" type networks out there?

No offense, but there is already far too many pointless networks already.
Back to top
pawlicki
none
none


Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Posts: 27

PostPosted: Nov 25, 2007 12:04am    Post subject: ... Reply with quote

but still... why not? Wink
Back to top
Invisible
Lurker
Lurker


Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 191

PostPosted: Nov 25, 2007 12:31am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why should anyone? What premise does having non standard ports have besides that people won't connect?
Back to top
ircmojo
Lurker
Lurker


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 215
Location: $HOME sweet $HOME

PostPosted: Nov 25, 2007 5:55am    Post subject: Re: ... Reply with quote

pawlicki wrote:
but still... why not? Wink


Frankly, it's a stupid idea. There are already countless other networks out there that started the same way .. without a real purpose. It's a total waste of time and resources .. that's why not.
Back to top
Jobe
Idler
Idler


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 374
Location: Lurking in the shadows of some random channel!

PostPosted: Nov 25, 2007 8:01am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not to mention the confusion non-standard ports cause.

"I cant connect to your network! Why?" <- will be a frequently asked question, because nearly all users try 6667 or 6697 for SSL
Back to top
pawlicki
none
none


Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Posts: 27

PostPosted: Nov 25, 2007 7:25pm    Post subject: ... Reply with quote

Actually you're misguided.

Most IRC boxes have these ports unused, so in fact they're wasting the resources by having 1 ircd running and all the unused ports.

IRCd does not take much bandwidth, nor does it take alot of memory.

Running 1 service on a modern server (unless it's a huge network like dalnet), is like having a 18-wheeler to haul 5 lbs of groceries.

Think before you criticize.
Back to top
Invisible
Lurker
Lurker


Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 191

PostPosted: Nov 25, 2007 8:01pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We understand this, but the fact is that most users don't have these ports selected to connect on since most users go to what most ircd boxes use which is the standard ports. What you need if you have a large box and no standard ports but want to run more is to buy extra ips to be assigned to the box and then you can use the standard ports. Otherwise you need to think of a use for non standard port using besides just for the hell of it.
Back to top
Jobe
Idler
Idler


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 374
Location: Lurking in the shadows of some random channel!

PostPosted: Nov 25, 2007 8:10pm    Post subject: Re: ... Reply with quote

pawlicki wrote:
Actually you're misguided.

Most IRC boxes have these ports unused, so in fact they're wasting the resources by having 1 ircd running and all the unused ports.


If that was at me, you missed my point, users try 6667 because they assume it to be the default port. So if you host and IRCd on the same IP as another networls, them on 6667 and yours on 9997, would you want users connecting to the other network and not yours?
Back to top
ircmojo
Lurker
Lurker


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 215
Location: $HOME sweet $HOME

PostPosted: Nov 25, 2007 8:16pm    Post subject: Re: ... Reply with quote

pawlicki wrote:
Actually you're misguided.

Most IRC boxes have these ports unused, so in fact they're wasting the resources by having 1 ircd running and all the unused ports.

IRCd does not take much bandwidth, nor does it take alot of memory.

Running 1 service on a modern server (unless it's a huge network like dalnet), is like having a 18-wheeler to haul 5 lbs of groceries.

Think before you criticize.


SearchIRC indexes 4400+ networks, it only takes 20 users to be larger than 90% of them. That's how many empty networks there are. Yet you want to toss out " people are wasting resources" speach. The fact of setting up yet another pointless network is a MUCH larger waste than having un-used ports on your box.

Unused ports aren't wasting anything .. they are just that .. unused. 0 resources are used on those ports.

Setting a network wastes, memory, cpu cycles, time, webspace, IP's, ports hard drive space just to name a few.

So it is you that needs to think before hand.
Back to top
greg27
Lurker
Lurker


Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 159
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Nov 25, 2007 10:55pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

most providers offer additional ip addresses for around $1 a month - why not just pay for another ip address and set up your 'new network' on the standard 6667 port? this will still aid in solving the alleged 'wasted box' issue.

but anyway - why create a network for the hell of it? as ircmojo said, an unused network is a waste of resources. the aim is to minimise server memory use, not run additional services for the sole reason that there is some unused memory.
Back to top
Jobe
Idler
Idler


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 374
Location: Lurking in the shadows of some random channel!

PostPosted: Nov 26, 2007 4:02am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What about the fact we're rapidly running out of IP addresses? Is wasting another one on an IRC network that will 9 times out fo 10 fail not a waste?

It's bad enough you can find organisations like for example US uni's with large blocks of IP addresses just so each computer can have it's own IP address when barely any of them need to be accessed directly from the internet.

Another thing that doesnt help is networks who demand the ONLY services on your box (and consequently your IP address) is the IRCd and SSHd. Where the IP address could easily also be used to host a small website, DNS or other more useful services.
Back to top
PingBad
Guru
Guru


Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 2064
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Nov 26, 2007 3:36pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jobe wrote:
Another thing that doesnt help is networks who demand the ONLY services on your box (and consequently your IP address) is the IRCd and SSHd. Where the IP address could easily also be used to host a small website, DNS or other more useful services.
True, but look at the other side of the coin - more services on the box means more apps to patch/update. It's all about attack surface
Back to top
Lord_Diablo
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 80
Location: Fairfield,CA

PostPosted: Nov 27, 2007 1:35am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yea... not a great idea. Alot of us have done this already as a fun throw it together thing, and it really only ended up being a flame war, ddos park, and gzline heaven.... Not worth even attempting =)
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SearchIRC Forum Index -> Help Wanted All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
 
Forum powered by phpBB
 
 © 2000 - 2008 EverythingIRC, Inc. All rights reserved. Please read our disclaimer