Home | Networks | Community | Need Help? 

 
 Quick search

 
 
 RegisterRegister   Log inLog in 

IRC versus MSN, YIM, ICQ and the rest

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SearchIRC Forum Index -> The Future of IRC

IRC versus MSN, AIM, YIM, ICQ, etc
IRC is the bomb!!!
77%
 77%  [ 21 ]
MSN r00lz
7%
 7%  [ 2 ]
YIM iz da kewlezt
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
ICQ is phat
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
They all suck donkeyballs
14%
 14%  [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 27

Author Message
MrBurns
Lurker
Lurker


Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 169
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Jun 29, 2006 6:31am    Post subject: IRC versus MSN, YIM, ICQ and the rest Reply with quote

More and more people don't know how to use IRC, don't want to know or simply think programs like MSN are "better" because they look "nice".

If you're the kind of person who thinks "ancient" is a Playstation 1, then you probably have no idea how to start up a DOS program or use IRC. But for all others: I prefer IRC above all other "new, graphicly superior, user friendly" chat programs. Do you agree or do you think programs like MSN are the future and IRC is just for old people in rocking chairs?
Back to top
FuRiOuS
Lurker
Lurker


Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 244

PostPosted: Jun 29, 2006 8:00am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not gonna vote in this poll you forgot a category. I use all of the different options. Each has something that I like, I don't use ICQ as much as the others, but I still use it to an extent.
Back to top
MrBurns
Lurker
Lurker


Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 169
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Jun 29, 2006 2:31pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah I was thinking of a "I use all of them" option but couldn't be bothered. Besides, the vote isn't for what you use, it's for what you like the most / prefer to use. I use MSN too sometimes but I still think IRC is better.
Back to top
SATAN-HHH
Eleet
Eleet


Joined: 29 Nov 2003
Posts: 850
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Jun 29, 2006 6:22pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I use to stay on like aim and msn alot and never used irc not I'm the opposite. I very rarely log on to any messanger anymore.
Back to top
Safer_Sephiroth
none
none


Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Jun 30, 2006 2:32pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would say IRC is my favorite chat client since the others seem to lag my computer a lot or they lag naturally, and there's a lot more control over channels in IRC. The only thing IRC is missing that the others do have is voice chat and cam chat, which if there was a way to set that up, IRC would knock the rest out of the competition. Not sure if there is a way that could ever be developed truly. If it could or is in developments, that would be terrific and IRC would be able to keep up with the other mainstream chats. I don't really mind IRC being sort of underground compared to the other chat options though because it keeps most of the people who I can't read their typing any way off IRC. Some of the best chatters seem to find IRC and many IRC users tend to dismiss silly things like a/s/l and aohell talk. We have it, but not nearly as bad.
Back to top
FBI
Guru
Guru


Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 1494
Location: Federation Of Bored IRC'ers

PostPosted: Jun 30, 2006 3:28pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Long Live IRC!
Back to top
MrBurns
Lurker
Lurker


Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 169
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Jul 01, 2006 7:32am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Since it's been proven possible to add graphic gaming (such as the Dragonball Z game) to IRC, I see no reason why it wouldn't be possible to include voice-over-IP or video-over-IP on IRC using some kind of IRC-based chat program (Dragonball Z is a mIRC-script add-on, so this could be done the same?)
Back to top
magpie
Idler
Idler


Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 454
Location: Essex, UK

PostPosted: Jul 01, 2006 8:01am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's the point of adding VOIP capabilities to IRC? Why not use technology that's more suited to it, otherwise you'll just end up adding something like DCC which isn't really part of IRC at all.
Back to top
MrBurns
Lurker
Lurker


Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 169
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Jul 02, 2006 1:49am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"technology that's more suited to it"

such as?
Back to top
bobjuh
none
none


Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 26

PostPosted: Jul 02, 2006 3:38pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

IRC is the bomb!!!
Back to top
magpie
Idler
Idler


Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 454
Location: Essex, UK

PostPosted: Jul 03, 2006 3:18am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe the plethora of VOIP applications/networks that already exist. Any attempt to add it to IRC is going to be a massive kludge.
Back to top
MrBurns
Lurker
Lurker


Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 169
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Jul 03, 2006 12:06pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hi again bobjuh Wink

Maybe adding VOIP to IRC will suck donkeyballs, but if you don't like it, just don't use it. I don't think many networks would want to anyways due to the massive increase in bandwith it would consume.
Back to top
magpie
Idler
Idler


Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 454
Location: Essex, UK

PostPosted: Jul 03, 2006 12:41pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not just that, but you then add the latency of the IRC network. To counter that you'd end up directing packets directly at your peers, which is why I originally made the DCC comparison.
Back to top
Ty
none
none


Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 47

PostPosted: Jul 03, 2006 9:09pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Asking this on a forum dedicated to IRC is a bit pointless.
Back to top
ARcanUSNUMquam
none
none


Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 42

PostPosted: Jul 04, 2006 12:51pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're comparing apples and oranges. Those IM apps are meant for a private conversation situation. IRC is meant for a group chatting.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SearchIRC Forum Index -> The Future of IRC All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
 
Forum powered by phpBB
 
 © 2000 - 2008 EverythingIRC, Inc. All rights reserved. Please read our disclaimer