|
|
| Author |
Message |
w00t
Eleet
Joined: 09 Jun 2004
Posts: 699
Location: Nowra, Australia
|
 Posted: Dec 20, 2005 11:16pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Because it's not commonly used?
I can point you to another few hundred such projects, and I assure you they suck equally. Though, it is of course your decision what you use. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trystan
Eleet
Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 756
Location: SLC Utah
|
| Posted: Dec 21, 2005 12:08am Post subject: |
|
|
They also break the RFC completely and allow color control characters in their vhosts..
I've known Tibs for a while.. his intentions are good just had to build an ircd around what his network needs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MOVIEBOT
Lurker
Joined: 24 May 2004
Posts: 229
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Dec 21, 2005 1:31am Post subject: |
|
|
| dont really care what you think about QuakeIRCD its perfect for my network. STABLE!!! and great features thats all i need |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xtothez
none
Joined: 19 Dec 2005
Posts: 11
|
| Posted: Dec 21, 2005 9:20am Post subject: |
|
|
| MOVIEBOT wrote: | | dont really care what you think about QuakeIRCD its perfect for my network. STABLE!!! and great features thats all i need |
I hope you don't have any users with clients other than mIRC then. There's loads of client software that will glitch or crash because the IRC daemon doesn't follow the RFC. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nenolod
Idler
Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 335
Location: A box!
|
| Posted: Dec 21, 2005 8:29pm Post subject: |
|
|
QuakeIRCd does not use SourceForge anymore, iirc.
A person I used to work with a bit tried it once, it seemed like UnrealIRCd on crack to me anyway.
I guess I just want something that is simple and works, though. *shrug* |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
w00t
Eleet
Joined: 09 Jun 2004
Posts: 699
Location: Nowra, Australia
|
| Posted: Dec 21, 2005 11:47pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, then that might explain some things.
Still, if you're going to fork, it at least pays to stay up to date with development, and forking something that's sane to start off with helps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OvErRiTe
none
Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Dec 23, 2005 8:44pm Post subject: |
|
|
The mode +I in viagra pertains only to channels, and warnings are sent to operators when the mode I is invoked.
There is no method of spying on private messages in Viagra IRCd or on channels of which you are not a member of. The module referred to for Unreal will allow for the monitoring of private messages and channels your not a member of.
Keep in mind that +I is also intended for the use of services since there are many service clients such as those used for flood protection which you may not want visible.
-OvErRiTe |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nenolod
Idler
Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 335
Location: A box!
|
| Posted: Dec 25, 2005 6:12pm Post subject: |
|
|
| OvErRiTe wrote: | | The mode +I in viagra pertains only to channels, and warnings are sent to operators when the mode I is invoked. |
Unethical as hell and still a violation of privacy.
| OvErRiTe wrote: | | There is no method of spying on private messages in Viagra IRCd or on channels of which you are not a member of. The module referred to for Unreal will allow for the monitoring of private messages and channels your not a member of. |
That's nice, but you still have ethical violations of your own. Defending them and going "Unreal is worse!" only makes you look hypocritical. (Just some friendly advice.)
| OvErRite wrote: | | Keep in mind that +I is also intended for the use of services since there are many service clients such as those used for flood protection which you may not want visible. |
That's a great intention, really! It is! But it's still an ethics violation and you shouldn't be providing your users with those tools.
--nenolod |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Register
Log in
