|
|
| Are you bored of constant unreal/anope networks? |
| Yes |
|
43% |
[ 28 ] |
| No |
|
29% |
[ 19 ] |
| Don't Care |
|
27% |
[ 18 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 65 |
|
| Author |
Message |
marhazk none

Joined: 29 Jun 2004 Posts: 20 Location: Somewhere in IntraNet..hehe
|
Posted: Jun 24, 2005 9:27am Post subject: |
|
|
| w00t wrote: | | Quote: | | Im using UnrealIRCD and ANOPE, but I prefer Auspice and Anope. |
Huh? That doesn't make sense. Unreal is an ircd, anope and auspice are both services. Saying you use Anope but prefer Auspice would make sense, I presume that's what you mean?
|
Actually, im using UnrealIRCD version and Anope IRC service to run on my network, AND I like Auspice and Anope IRC service. LOL.
| w00t wrote: | | Auspice has more problems than that. I've heard it's back under dev, but I think it's to the point where it's unworkable - especially when even thilo's already made such headway over 2.8.1. In Mean might do a better job re-forking ircservices and working the featureset he wants in. |
I've heard that Auspice will back and released at the end of year 2005 (Maybe, depands). A latest version of Auspice is 2.8.1 and its was released at year 2004 (Lol, its took 1 year to recoded it or retired) but its a good news because Auspice will back. A newest Auspice version is 3.0. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
w00t Eleet

Joined: 09 Jun 2004 Posts: 699 Location: Nowra, Australia
|
Posted: Jun 25, 2005 7:25am Post subject: |
|
|
Huh?!
Auspice 2.8.1 was released in 2000. I know this for two reasons, one, I used Auspice 2.8.1 when I started being an oper in 2002-2003, the SourceForge dates (2002-10-17 11:43 is the mention for the 2.8.1 docs) and the file dates (all circa 2001).
The "newest" version is currently 2.8.1, according to In Mean, 2.9 is scheduled for alphas etc at the end of this month, a "stable" (and I use the term loosely) is scheduled for next month.
3.0 is currently vapourware.
As I said, auspice is pretty much unworkable now, with the amount of bugs, design flaws and problems it has - it's really become redundant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sailirc none

Joined: 12 Sep 2004 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Dec 05, 2005 4:49pm Post subject: hrm |
|
|
| well we still use the ircservices. from what Im reading ircservices is not the popular choice. I have never used Anope.. whats the difference between the two anyways? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GeniusDex Lurker

Joined: 16 Aug 2003 Posts: 150
|
Posted: Dec 06, 2005 2:08am Post subject: |
|
|
That's like asking "what's the difference between internet explorer and firefox?" (don't take that too literally tho)
IRC Services and Anope are both maintained by completely different people, both progress in different way, have different features, and different strengths and weaknesses. There is a list comparing different services packages at http://wiki.anope.org/Other:ComparisonChart which includes both anope and irc services  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| |