Home | Networks | Community | Need Help? 

 
 Quick search

 
 
 RegisterRegister   Log inLog in 

Your Favorite IRCd
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SearchIRC Forum Index -> IRCD & Network Services

What is your favorite IRCd
Unreal
58%
 58%  [ 14 ]
Ultimate
16%
 16%  [ 4 ]
hybird
4%
 4%  [ 1 ]
other (see post)
20%
 20%  [ 5 ]
Total Votes : 24

Author Message
Julio[joking]
Guest





PostPosted: Apr 15, 2004 6:36am    Post subject: About the al5001 antispam Reply with quote

About the al5001 antispam

Yes, the antispam was good years ago. I see this antispam too. Of course I include in the last versions when I was linking with Phanton too, in the antispam for ircd some of their tools, but is less than the 10% of the new set.

al5001 you are free of download and use, it's opensouce, but please don't delete the credits of others developers. They know how do a good job too.

And don't worry for invites, my own network it's only a place for develop and release or test. I haven't real users, only developers.

Sincereslly

JulioBell
Back to top
Julio[teaching]
Guest





PostPosted: Apr 15, 2004 3:04pm    Post subject: About C or C++, and spam in other codes Reply with quote

Yes that some version is compiling in C++ and not in C. But what joke is this. In the time of the Bahamut develop the C++ compilers don't have full develop. Unrealircd is compiling in my case, the Windows versions, with VC++ compilers and Visual Studio tools. Can have code typing in all the languages programs that someone want.

So sorry in the open souce jobs profesional too. When they was compiling CR, I was teaching C/C++ in IBM.

C++ have the full set of C, and I can compile all their code in the same compiler, and much of their is open. The most modern version of the same code are in the unrealircd proyect.

About services ircu. This is the list.

IRC server (IRCD) name services module

Bahamut 1.4.25 - 1.4.34 bahamut
Chunky Monkey IRCD 1.0 and above monkey
DALnet (ircd.dal) 4.4.13 and below dalnet
DALnet (ircd.dal) 4.4.15 and above dreamforge
Dreamforge (ircd.dal 4.6.x) dreamforge
ircd-2.8.x rfc1459
ircd-2.8.x+TS8 ts8
ircu (Undernet) 2.9.x undernet-p9
tr-ircd 4.0, 5.0 and above trircd
UltimateIRCD 2.8.1 dreamforge
UltimateIRCD 3.0.0 bahamut
Unreal 3.1.1 and above unreal

And the people of ircservices, know better than anyone the line.

And about antispams:

/* Anti flood protection */
anti-flood {
nick-flood 3:10; /* 3 nickchanges per 10 seconds (the default) */
};

This is the config file

What Value they have free

Julio
Educational Consultant
Back to top
JulioBell[tired]
Guest





PostPosted: Apr 16, 2004 12:01pm    Post subject: tired of comments about what is IRC Reply with quote

al5001 Im tired that u ever speak about CR, why don't do SearchICR and let me rest.

Yes I probe ur version, like I probe, dancer, unrealircd, Bahamut, Ultimate, Modrigan, Hybrid7 ...

And only ur stupid company give me problems ...

Develop more, for me u aren't more IRC and Im not going to work for to be compatible with u ...

It's ur job if u want stay in the list to be compatible with us

JulioBell
in IRC6
Back to top
rakaur
none
none


Joined: 09 Feb 2004
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Apr 16, 2004 2:00pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are so many claims in this thread with zero foundation it's hard to tell where to even start. I especially like the "<insert lameass ircd here> is the best ircd!" ones. Why? Because they have a kadzillion features? No one bothers to mention that most "Unreal-like" features use a metric shitload of CPU. They're nice on RAM, but in real life servers usually have CPU limitations, not memory limitations. ratbox (which uses considerably more RAM than most ircds) only uses around 600mB with 300k users and most servers have well over a gB total. I never saw the point in going from static to dynamic memory allocation (Unreal, Ultimate) for certain strings as malloc() and friends are very expensive CPU wise. So unless you're using a block allocator (mmap() comes to mind) you're not gaining much.

CR in my experience is more unstable than any open source ircd that I've played with. Built-in services are just not a good idea. If you took an open source ircd and slapped a GUI on top it'd probably come close to CR.

I've seen "I love Unreal because it's modular!" Yeah, modules are nice. However, pretty much every major ircd (bahamut to an extent, unreal, hybrid7, ratbox, csircd, etc) all have support for runtime module loading (even if the source code is not modular by design).

Quote:
Why would you pay for Windows, when you can get Linux for free?

Why would you pay for Photoshop, when you can get GIMP for free?

Why is this even posted here? You think the majority of Windows users actually pay for their OS? Same goes for Photoshop. And, you are aware things other than Linux exist right? BSD, Solaris, ...

I really see no topic left in this thread other than opportunity for flaming (which looks to be the aim by the starting post title) because everyone has different opinions, especially about which ircd/os/services/messenger/cpu brand/gpu brand/etc/etc is "the best" and people argue about it as if it is somehow connected to their bodies. If you're going to continue I suggest backing up your statements with reasons so we can actually get a clear idea of why you think something is better than something else because "Unreal is the best!" doesn't tell us a whole lot.
Back to top
ed
SearchIRC Staff
SearchIRC Staff


Joined: 25 May 2003
Posts: 367
Location: Baton Rouge, LA

PostPosted: Apr 16, 2004 2:25pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rakaur wrote:
Why is this even posted here? You think the majority of Windows users actually pay for their OS? Same goes for Photoshop. And, you are aware things other than Linux exist right? BSD, Solaris, ...


I was taking a sarcastic view of DjMadness-'s comment:
Quote:

why pay for an IRCd when u can get it for free ?
you could modify an ircd to suite your own needs, end even if u want u could just make the same features as CR has.


But, anyhow, I do believe that quite a few people purchase Windows, whether directly or indirectly. Nearly all of the new computers are sold with Windows preinstalled.

I'm done beating a dead animal.
Back to top
Julio[agree]
Guest





PostPosted: Apr 16, 2004 6:50pm    Post subject: Im agree with the last comments Reply with quote

Yes, Im very agree with the last coments, of course that I pay for software too. Im runing a Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition, that is a Microsoft Operating System. The server webmaster.webchat.org, is runing over Linux.

Yes the star company of Windows IRC Servers for Lammers is runing their servers over a GNU/Linux System.

About the use of memory, yes I use DDR memory in a Windows 2k3 Enterprise, and the server of IRC that acomodate best to this fuction is Unrelircd 3.2. So good developers, if I need recomend to someone what version of IRC Server run over a Windows 2003 Datacenter, Im very sure about what recommend. This isn't that we can't pay, it's that we are developing elite tools with thousands of hands sharing the same code, ...
And if this company is a Bank, Im more sure for his last support SSL.

Companies like IBM use opensouce technology, in their clusters servers over all platforms ...

I think that the private companies some times don't know choose the correct staf for post comments in public forums ...

This person use bouncers, can be that they can't pay a permanent internet conection, like a lot of perople that use open souce tools can ...

JulioBell
Back to top
Julio [i]
Guest





PostPosted: Apr 16, 2004 7:15pm    Post subject: Why pay... Reply with quote

Why pay, .. yes of course that the people that use open souce can pay, sometimes more than others ...

This is the price of a seminar of 4 days of IBM z/390 ... opensouce

Domino for zSeries & S/390 Performance Workshop (ESM75FR)
Format Sessions planifiées
Duration 4.0 Day(s)
Audience OS/390 System/Performance Analyst
Notes Administrator

Price 2600.00 EUR HT
3109.60 EUR TTC

The CR versions of IRCd have not justicated their price from my point of view. Unrealircd 3.2 must be more expensive ... ty to the opensouce developers.

JulioBell
Back to top
Julio[:'-(]
Guest





PostPosted: Apr 17, 2004 12:29am    Post subject: Im so sad Reply with quote

Yes we type in a folder IRCServices

The GNU/GPL new set of standars ...

and I see the new CR over OsX

their folder say ..

CRServices ...

I want cry today for the future of the IRC
:'-(

Julio
Back to top
Julio[:¡-(]
Guest





PostPosted: Apr 17, 2004 12:43am    Post subject: Who is the thief ... Reply with quote

Who is stolen to who?

Please, ...

It's time to be sincere

The developers of Dalnet Bahamut, are so good profesionals. Im learning a lot reading their job

Julio
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Apr 17, 2004 1:45am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stop trolling and star making some sense!!
Back to top
rakaur
none
none


Joined: 09 Feb 2004
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Apr 17, 2004 5:34am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bahamut 1.4 is actually pretty poorly written. It's based off of hybrid5 which is acient.

Also, it would be nice if you posted once instead of 30 times per second.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Jul 05, 2004 5:22am    Post subject: Reply with quote

al5001 wrote:
Lets get to the point. Running a type of IRCd depends on what you wish to use it for. As I said, conferenceroom has taken measures to put video conference in the software. It is useful for online classrooms, and also if you want mainly java users from a website. You can control spambots and clone attacks by setting the server to java clients only. Yes, be warned, the video conference takes a huge amount of bandwith, which is why it would only work if you charged a profit for users watching the video.

Conferenceroom does mask hostnames with usermode +x so that others cannot see your real hostname/IP. However, my argument was about the fact that on unrealircd (and many other IRCds), the /CHGHOST and /VHOST commands (along with a hostserv service) are often abused, and should never be coded into the IRCd, as well I don't like having any host changing abilities except for opers, which all opers should have the same hostname when they do /oper.

I don't run a cracked version of conferenceroom. In fact, I just use a trial version and check out its abilities.

Every time I go to a network and see someone with a hostname that says:

leet@I-am-leet.leet.h4x0rs.com

Or some crap like that, I get totally turned off. I like the ability to see at least part of the person's hostname.

For opers, I dont mind if I see something like:

admin@=Yhn5Jh.domain.com

Where domain.com is the domain name of the server. Then it is easier to tell who is an oper without having to type /whois nick.
Back to top
Gizmo967
none
none


Joined: 06 Mar 2004
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Jul 17, 2004 7:32am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My vote goes for UnrealIRCd, it's awsom! Smile
Back to top
Kuja
none
none


Joined: 04 Mar 2004
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Aug 05, 2004 1:56am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TR-IRCD is the best of (all?) worlds. It has features from Bahamut, Hybrid, and a bunch of it's own features.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SearchIRC Forum Index -> IRCD & Network Services All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 
 
Forum powered by phpBB
 
 © 2000 - 2008 EverythingIRC, Inc. All rights reserved. Please read our disclaimer