|
|
| Author |
Message |
Keiji
Newbie
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 66
|
 Posted: Jul 09, 2006 4:45pm Post subject: Having two IRCd services |
 |
|
| I find two services very convinent, but some have commands I prefer not to use. Stupid question, but is there anyway possible to run two services, if you disable some of the services from each of the two, so that they can run sync. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aven
Idler
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 393
|
| Posted: Jul 09, 2006 4:48pm Post subject: |
|
|
haven't seen this done before, but yeah, you can.
You would just have to give each of them their own server name, etc. and you can't have both use "ChanServ" nickname, mabye disable chanserv in one and enable it in another?
Although, it would not be possible for the other service to work with the other, because since you have to register a nickname to use memoserv, chanserv, etc. chanserv, memoserv need to be using the same DB and services package.
So, it's possible to run two services, but they won't work together. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Keiji
Newbie
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 66
|
| Posted: Jul 09, 2006 4:52pm Post subject: |
|
|
| well, I was thinking of using all of surrealservices, with anope's botserv(since it includes kick options) and operserv (since it can't be disabled) think it would work? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aven
Idler
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 393
|
| Posted: Jul 09, 2006 5:12pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't you need a registered nickname to use operserv? if so, then you can't.
As for botserv, you also need some kind of identification. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Keiji
Newbie
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 66
|
| Posted: Jul 09, 2006 5:15pm Post subject: |
|
|
| hmm... looks like I'm gonna have to get a coder x_x; Know anywhere I can find a few modules to add to surrealservices? flood protection, badword kicks, etc. found in /botserv kick? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Keiji
Newbie
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 66
|
| Posted: Jul 09, 2006 7:30pm Post subject: |
|
|
| surrealservices is what I need, but it doesn't have features such as flood/repeat kick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Keiji
Newbie
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 66
|
| Posted: Jul 10, 2006 10:28am Post subject: |
|
|
| does anope have a module with a co-founder option? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MrBurns
Lurker
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 169
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Jul 10, 2006 12:22pm Post subject: |
|
|
| co-founder for channels? If so, yes that's actually part of the service but it's called successor instead of co-founder |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FuRiOuS
Lurker
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 244
|
| Posted: Jul 10, 2006 12:23pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes anope does. Looke on anope's web site and you should find the module you need. I have it loaded and it works just fine for me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
katsklaw
Guru
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1114
|
| Posted: Jul 10, 2006 3:28pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MrBurns wrote: | | co-founder for channels? If so, yes that's actually part of the service but it's called successor instead of co-founder |
Not actually. A successor is the person that "inherits" the channel in the even the founders nick is dropped or expires.
Anope doesn't have a co-founder per se in the core. However, if you as the founder turn on SECUREFOUNDER, then you can give the channel password to the person(s) you would like as "co-founder" and they can do everything a founder can do after they identify to ChanServ except change the channel password/founder/successor nor drop the channel.
| Code: |
.:17:22:. -ChanServ- Syntax: SET channel SECUREFOUNDER {ON | OFF}
-
.:17:22:. -ChanServ-
-
.:17:22:. -ChanServ- Enables or disables the secure founder option for a channel.
-
.:17:22:. -ChanServ- When secure founder is set, only the real founder will be
-
.:17:22:. -ChanServ- able to drop the channel, change its password, its founder and its
-
.:17:22:. -ChanServ- successor, and not those who are IDENTIFY'd with ChanServ.
-
|
Not only does this provide a way to have co-founders without a module .. but secures the channel from being dropped/pass changed if the channel password were compromised. In addition, it works on Anope driven networks where you don't have access to load modules, non-oper status for example and still want a co-founder. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Keiji
Newbie
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 66
|
| Posted: Jul 10, 2006 5:16pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I know, but /cs identify is somewhat dangerous in the perspective of the founder, I know you can change the password if someone finds out, but that means alot more of a hassle, I'm probably going with surrealservices. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
katsklaw
Guru
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1114
|
| Posted: Jul 10, 2006 5:57pm Post subject: |
|
|
Let me get this straight .. your entire reasoning for switching services is because there is a slight chance someone can find out a channel's password?!
Have you considered the fact that surreal services are not perfect either? The founders password can still be leaked regardless of of which services you use. At least with Anope, only the TRUE founder can change the channel pass and not just anyone that has it. Which stops the channel from being hijacked. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Keiji
Newbie
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 66
|
| Posted: Jul 10, 2006 6:43pm Post subject: |
|
|
| surreal doesn't have a /cs identify, not to mention the fact, that its alot easier to set a op's level, anope is great, but in my opinion, surreal is better channel protection wise |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tZers
none
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Jul 11, 2006 6:26am Post subject: |
|
|
| It is impossible |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Keiji
Newbie
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 66
|
| Posted: Jul 11, 2006 9:14am Post subject: |
|
|
| random *_* lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Register
Log in
