|
|
| Author |
Message |
BuLB
none
Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 20
|
 Posted: Aug 16, 2004 9:17am Post subject: how to convert database of anope to auspice? |
 |
|
| anybody here knows how to convert database of anope to auspice services? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pierce
none
Joined: 09 Feb 2004
Posts: 47
|
| Posted: Aug 16, 2004 9:55am Post subject: |
|
|
why would you want to do that? Auspices have stoped development of their services, and wont be continuing with them
Pierce |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BuLB
none
Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 20
|
| Posted: Aug 18, 2004 2:55am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes its already not running anynmore but we can modify it for our own taste..i like the way its access on channels style cause the one who will add will be seen when you query and its memoserv is like in dalnet it does have news and an auto email upon register..in anope its just the access list not knowing who add and the memoserv is not the brood unlike auspice
i just want to know if there is a way to convert database from anope to auspice?
and is there anyone knows services that is like auspice's memoserv and access list? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
w00t
Eleet
Joined: 09 Jun 2004
Posts: 699
Location: Nowra, Australia
|
| Posted: Aug 18, 2004 5:10pm Post subject: |
|
|
1) No there isnt any way to convert (afaik)
2) What do you like about Auspice, if I agree with you, I'll consider whacking it in Winse some day. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mouselike
Idler
Joined: 09 Dec 2003
Posts: 271
|
| Posted: Aug 18, 2004 5:35pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BuLB wrote: | | but we can modify it for our own taste.. |
Hi,
If you can modify the source code then sticking together a DB converter wouldnt be that complicated, why else would you ask otherwise?
On a more nicer side note, your best sticking off with anope as its always in development, ircd's are changing modes and the way they link at some point which will break auspice's IRCd compatibility protocol support somewhere along the line. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
w00t
Eleet
Joined: 09 Jun 2004
Posts: 699
Location: Nowra, Australia
|
| Posted: Aug 18, 2004 6:21pm Post subject: |
|
|
mouselike, apparantly Auspice isn't quite as dead as some of the more educated would like... I've heard rumors about a new release sometime soon.
Anyhow, Auspice already lacks support for some features. Like mlocking +f in Unreal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aquanight
Lurker
Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Posts: 118
Location: Boise, ID
|
| Posted: Aug 19, 2004 3:43pm Post subject: |
|
|
| w00t wrote: | | Anyhow, Auspice already lacks support for some features. Like mlocking +f in Unreal. |
Anope also lacks this  . This is definately somthing I'm going to address in WinSE. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
w00t
Eleet
Joined: 09 Jun 2004
Posts: 699
Location: Nowra, Australia
|
| Posted: Aug 19, 2004 5:53pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm, I thought they fixed that? Maybe it was ircservices.
As for fixing it in winse, we really need to stop changing how the core works first  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mouselike
Idler
Joined: 09 Dec 2003
Posts: 271
|
| Posted: Aug 20, 2004 3:30pm Post subject: |
|
|
| w00t wrote: | mouselike, apparantly Auspice isn't quite as dead as some of the more educated would like... I've heard rumors about a new release sometime soon.
Anyhow, Auspice already lacks support for some features. Like mlocking +f in Unreal. |
Ive heard this too, but it would appear its more or less a complete overhall of the last auspice version, so its very likely the DB will be slightly or completely different too.
If auspices is still in development then its obviously not as productive as anope, however if anope hasnt already fixed mlocking +f then i cant vouch for the eta on when the coders will do it but i am sure they will soon enough once they get to it in the todo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aquanight
Lurker
Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Posts: 118
Location: Boise, ID
|
| Posted: Aug 30, 2004 1:16pm Post subject: |
|
|
| w00t wrote: | | Hmm, I thought they fixed that? Maybe it was ircservices. |
Apparently I'm wrong: Anope allows mlocking the OLD format, but not the new format used by Unreal (though it converts from 5:10 to [5t]:10 and *5:10 to [5t#b]:10 automatically). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Register
Log in
