|
|
| Author |
Message |
Lyhne1
Newbie
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 61
Location: USA
|
 Posted: Jul 05, 2008 12:53am Post subject: About Me and My Network |
 |
|
Howdy All,
I'm Original Owner of BlackLotus Anime Crew. Been around when Ircspy was in its prime.I'm allso one the original Members of Slaughterhouse off coolchat.
in my late 30's and Love Anime.
Me and Lizard have Just started up are own network. Lizard owns the Hub and I own the two IRCD services I have. Are Network is Irc.stoke-irc.net 6667 Soon Lizard gets back we will be submitting are Network If Lizard hasnt done so allready.
We all ways have New Movie same day they are released in Movie theaters.
We are look for good people that easy going that like help are Network grow.
So if you like to check us out stop on by and say hello.
Sign:
Lyhne1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leet
Newbie
Joined: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 78
Location: New York
|
| Posted: Jul 05, 2008 1:12am Post subject: |
|
|
| nice ill stop by |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lyhne1
Newbie
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 61
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Jul 05, 2008 3:26pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Port been changed from 6667 to 6668 now.
Irc.stoke-irc.net 6668 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Leet
Newbie
Joined: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 78
Location: New York
|
| Posted: Jul 05, 2008 7:14pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Is there any port open on 6667? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lyhne1
Newbie
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 61
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Jul 05, 2008 9:56pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Leet wrote: | | Is there any port open on 6667? |
Yes Port 6667 been changed over for Admins and services. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Leet
Newbie
Joined: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 78
Location: New York
|
| Posted: Jul 05, 2008 11:52pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Why though why wouldnt u allow users to use 6667? and make services on another? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lyhne1
Newbie
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 61
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Jul 06, 2008 10:19am Post subject: |
|
|
| Leet wrote: | | Why though why wouldnt u allow users to use 6667? and make services on another? |
soon Lizard can tell us what his thinking in for that I will be able to tell ya.I think he try get link blocks to work out and not keep have broken pipe and few other issue. Its hard to say what he is thinking... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EcKstasy
Lurker
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 135
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Aug 20, 2008 5:20am Post subject: |
|
|
| /me wonders what happened to port 7000 for services |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Xaphan
Newbie
Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 78
|
| Posted: Aug 20, 2008 11:35am Post subject: |
|
|
| ...or 4400. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mary
SearchIRC Admin
Joined: 03 May 2003
Posts: 692
|
| Posted: Aug 20, 2008 12:11pm Post subject: |
|
|
Something to keep in mind if you plan on using a different port for IRC:
From our help section ( http://searchirc.com/help.php?id=146 ):
Can I be listed if my network doesn't use port 6667?
No. We require all networks to allow our indexer (and therefore users) to connect to port 6667. If another network is running on port 6667, and you are on port 6668 - we will not list the second network.
------
If you submit your network and we cannot connect to 6667 it will be rejected. If you are already listed and we can no longer connect to 6667 your network will be marked inactive, your data will not appear and your channels will not be listed. Users who select our irc:// link or java client will not be able to connect to your network as it is set to the standard IRC default port of 6667. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EcKstasy
Lurker
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 135
Location: Scotland
|
| Posted: Sep 03, 2008 1:21pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Xaphan wrote: | | ...or 4400. |
lolno |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PingBad
Guru
Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 2064
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Sep 03, 2008 2:28pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Xaphan wrote: | | ...or 4400. |
Or 8067 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
katsklaw
Guru
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1114
|
| Posted: Sep 03, 2008 3:01pm Post subject: |
|
|
Useless facts: The IRC protocol never defined a "default port" for anything. It's just that 6667 is the most popular port.
There has never been an official 7000 for services. In fact 4400 was used for ircd's long before services was ever invented. Since services connects as an ircd, it would be logical to assume services should also use 4400.
DALnet started using 7000 as their default client port long before anyone ever used it for services. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zeke
Idler
Joined: 04 Oct 2003
Posts: 321
|
| Posted: Sep 03, 2008 8:17pm Post subject: |
|
|
| katsklaw wrote: | Useless facts: The IRC protocol never defined a "default port" for anything. It's just that 6667 is the most popular port.
There has never been an official 7000 for services. In fact 4400 was used for ircd's long before services was ever invented. Since services connects as an ircd, it would be logical to assume services should also use 4400.
DALnet started using 7000 as their default client port long before anyone ever used it for services. |
To quote wikipedia, although the protocol didn't define a 'default port', IANA did assign one:
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Relay_Chat wrote: | | IRC was originally a plain text protocol (although later extended), which on request was assigned port 194/TCP by IANA. However, the de facto has always been to run IRC on 6667/TCP and nearby port numbers to avoid having to run the IRCd software with root privileges. It is possible (though quite inconvenient) to use IRC via a basic byte-stream client such as netcat or telnet. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Register
Log in
