Do any networks use SRVX?

takinglives · none Joined: 29 Sep 2006 Posts: 10

Like the topic says do any? Besides the mogul giants gamesurge ETG ect... Im looking for 10-100 person network with SRVX. I like anope but SRVX is my first love.

Thanks,
Richards
CCNA Cetified Network engineer

Stefano · Eleet Joined: 03 Apr 2005 Posts: 527 Location: Beirut

Katlyn · none Joined: 30 Sep 2006 Posts: 43

Hi,

My network, ClanIRC, uses srvx - on average we have anywhere from 50-150 users connected at once, however we're made up of only three main channels which are very specific in content. You can access it with irc.theunforgotten.net until a permanent rr is setup.

I've been using srvx for years and in my opinion it is far superior than other services :p

Stefano · Eleet Joined: 03 Apr 2005 Posts: 527 Location: Beirut

i have problems with cookies they are not always delivered. but i like srvx because its sort of mixture of undernet & dalnet.. i like it because its the easiest and simliest services.

Katlyn · none Joined: 30 Sep 2006 Posts: 43

Jobe · Posted: Oct 01, 2006 4:34am Post subject:

Hotmail tend to go to the extent of ignoring SPF checks on an email to determine it as coming from an authorized sending server for that domain Where as a lot of ISP's like AOL and many others do support SPF checks meaning if you have an SPF record set up for your domain telling the recipient servers out there of which servers are allowed to send mail for your domain then most places will accept it as legitimate instead of SPAM. See http://www.openspf.org/ for more information.

Please bear in mind that WONT prevent emails from your domain as being marked as spam nor will it be 100% efficiant but it will help with most recipients.

takinglives · none Joined: 29 Sep 2006 Posts: 10

Guys can we stay ON TOPIC. Thanks. Any other networks that use srvx?

Thanks,
Richard
CCNA Cetified Network Engineer

marc · Posted: Oct 02, 2006 3:02am Post subject:

I did until last night. I run GNUWorld now.

Stefano · Eleet Joined: 03 Apr 2005 Posts: 527 Location: Beirut

100% in junk mail when its delivered
25% of the time is not delivered at all!
sick of hotmail & yahoo

PingBad · Guru Joined: 05 Feb 2005 Posts: 2031 Location: New Zealand

lol, i use my domain's mailserver to handle the spam... of the hundred or so spam emails I get an hour, about 98% of them are vaped off the server, and the rest that do get delivered are taken care of by the mail filters I have on my system when I pick up the mail off the server... suck that spammers!

Stefano · Eleet Joined: 03 Apr 2005 Posts: 527 Location: Beirut

im wondering if i should put in my services an email such hotmail just to make sure it gets deliviered.. i dono.. lets just wait and see srvx 2 maybe these bugs will be fixed. (they say there are no bugs) but who knows

]Daniel · Idler Joined: 05 Jan 2006 Posts: 317 Location: Boise, ID

ive been using srvx for years. Never had mail issues, or any issues actually. Talking about the mail server IS staying on topic. Someone mentioned that they cant get the mail cookies working, Someone else gave them a response. That did not go off topic. So you should kinda stop jumping to conclusions.

Kuja · none Joined: 04 Mar 2004 Posts: 18

I don't use SRVX, and here's why (to my knowledge these things are correct, but if they are no longer true, please correct me):

SRVX developers modified the GPL making it non-osi compliant by adding a restriction that any members of the GamesNET staff or any relatives thereof cannot use SRVX. I feel that this is petty and lame.

The public SRVX that is distributed is often a few revisions behind what is actively being developed on and used on the SRVX parent network, GameSURGE.

I don't like the ethos of the SRVX lead developers.

The SRVX lead developers don't like me.

Rob_ · Idler Joined: 13 Dec 2003 Posts: 309

Kuja · none Joined: 04 Mar 2004 Posts: 18

I am well aware of section 6 of the GPL, and looking at the srvx license on the sourceforge cvs (can't seem to get access to arch) I don't see any traces of the modification...

Shrug. The other points I raise are still important.