Home | Networks | Community | Need Help? 

 
 Quick search

 
 
 RegisterRegister   Log inLog in 

Beirut Under Attack!!!!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SearchIRC Forum Index -> Chat
Author Message
PingBad
Guru
Guru


Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 2026
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Nov 09, 2006 12:54am    Post subject: Reply with quote

interesting, I've always been taught (in NZ anyway) that India is part of the asian continent while Israel, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, etc is of the Middle Eastern...

I would, however, like to see what makes ChatLink think that Israel is a mini-america, get their point of view on their statement
Back to top
Mary
SearchIRC Admin
SearchIRC Admin


Joined: 03 May 2003
Posts: 692

PostPosted: Nov 09, 2006 7:42am    Post subject: You say "potato," I say "patattah" Reply with quote

The map delineating continents is different from maps that determine race by origin. With so many people emigrating and intermarrying, our ability to associate a certain look or culture with a specific geographic area is getting very muddy.
Back to top
PingBad
Guru
Guru


Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 2026
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Nov 09, 2006 8:14am    Post subject: Reply with quote

indeed
Back to top
[S]niperR
none
none


Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Nov 12, 2006 10:30pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In Brunei.. we do not care about each others religion.. we care for our friendship and give equalty to everyone. War on the internet? it's just what we all do everyday ain't it...?!
Back to top
PingBad
Guru
Guru


Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 2026
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Nov 13, 2006 3:04am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[S]niperR wrote:
War on the internet? it's just what we all do everyday ain't it...?!
Only the lifeless - some people use the internet to compliment their daily lives, not ravage it
Back to top
ORenyRen
none
none


Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 38

PostPosted: Nov 14, 2006 2:30pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chatlink was right on one account. Israel is small. Israel is only slightly larger than New Jersey.
Back to top
Mary
SearchIRC Admin
SearchIRC Admin


Joined: 03 May 2003
Posts: 692

PostPosted: Nov 15, 2006 7:01am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Heads up on an interesting, and disturbing article by Walid Phares

Hizbollah's offensive in Lebanon has begun

"the aim of Hezbollah’s summer war with Israel, was to provoke a “strike-back” at the Lebanese Government and reshape the balance of power in Lebanon to the advantage of the Teheran-Damascus axis"

http://worlddefensereview.com/includes/phares111306pr.html

Read it all.
Back to top
Stefano
Eleet
Eleet


Joined: 03 Apr 2005
Posts: 527
Location: Beirut

PostPosted: Nov 26, 2006 7:21am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mregit wrote:
Both sides stopped their offensive operations, but Lebanon and the UN Peacekeepers have failed to remove the threat to Israel by disarming Hizbollah -.


im not a fan nor partisan of hezballa, but remember that israel is still invading the south of lebanon, so hezballa has all rights to be armed, and operate in the south of lebanon. thats why its called resistance.

now usa/israel call them terrorists, while the other part of the planet call them as resitance.

I do not think hezballa is a threat for israel since he is not on offensive but defensive. if hezballa wana be a mess out we have seen what he is able off. his intrest is only to leberate the southern lebanese shebaa farms which is anexed by israel.
Back to top
Stefano
Eleet
Eleet


Joined: 03 Apr 2005
Posts: 527
Location: Beirut

PostPosted: Nov 26, 2006 7:25am    Post subject: Reply with quote

btw i was in lebanon few hours ago.
a friend of mine who was politicial got assasinated few days ago..
things are going bad over there.

but we all know in lebanon that those who assasinated him arent the pro syrians. we are an old nation maybe one of the oldest on this planet. we know all those tricks. we belive a western country or their peeps in leb killed their one of their own to blaim the pro syrians to retake over the blanace and gain sympathy of the people... politics sucks..
Back to top
Mary
SearchIRC Admin
SearchIRC Admin


Joined: 03 May 2003
Posts: 692

PostPosted: Nov 26, 2006 3:11pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I do not think hezballa is a threat for israel since he is not on offensive but defensive.


Quote:
but we all know in lebanon that those who assasinated him arent the pro syrians.


Okay. So, let me see if I have this right.

Hizbollah is a patriotic militia whose purpose is to defend Lebanon from Israel.

The US is assassinating friends in the Lebanese government in order to provide an excuse to invade Iran.

When the Pope visits Turkey the Muslims will meet him with great hospitality but he will be assasinated by Roman Catholics.

9/11 was a plot by Israelis with the help of the US. No Jews showed up for work in the WTC that day.

Jews use the blood of Christian and Muslim children to make Matzoh.

Jews are monkeys and pigs.

Jews stole land from Arabs in the Middle East and now want to destroy Arabs and get all the rest of the land.

Jews steal the eyes and organs of non-jewish children for their own.

Your penis can fall off if you shake hands with an American.

The Holocaust never happened.

Iran is seeking nuclear technology for completely peaceful reasons.


Stefano, when I started on IRC back in 1993, the internet had not come into the Middle East. By 2000, there were many Romanians, Turks, and Middle Easterners online. One thing IRC ops became aware of as soon as we were called in to settle channel disputes, was the cultural attitude towards the truth. Users would say whatever they thought was necessary to get what they wanted. The truth was irrelevant. Lies were often blatant, and then laughed off like... well, that didn't work, will you believe this... and another lie would follow. It was so frustrating the network at times blocked entire countries from IRC, and refused to register channels from people from those country codes. Western judeo-christian culture - and I know you are Christian so you understand this - places a lot of value on always telling the truth. Coming from the same philosophy, it was very difficult for me to learn how to deal with a large group of people who could not ever be trusted.

The people of the West are going through a similar learning curve as we deal with your part of the world. We are learning the ideosyncracies of the culture, and as a people we are watching your news shows, your media - which is often picked up by OUR media - and we are astounded at the outrageous lies that are being passed off as truth. See the list above. What is even more disturbing is the "fauxtography" we see. Pictures are staged to tell an untrue story, rather than being a pictorial depiction of actual news.

After WWII, we wanted to help. We saw countries with great natural resources where the people were living in poverty and suffering from oppression. But every time the US stepped in, disaster resulted. Iraq is a perfect example. If you look back to the 90's, Iraqis in the US were petitioning our government for help freeing family members from jail. They told stories of oppression and mass murder. Their scientists came to our government with stories of Salman Pak, underground bunkers, mobile missile bases, and labs where anthrax, smallpox, and nuclear weapons were being developed. Not only President Bush, but the entire US government thought we were removing a threat to our country and freeing Iraq from an oppressive ruler. But instead of embracing freedom, the people turned on each other like wolves. No one can save a country that does not WANT to be saved. Even people who once supported the Iraq war want to bring our soldiers home.

We see now that our government was fed LIES... and instead of putting the blame where it is due, on all those Iraqis and others who wanted to see Saddam taken down, those lies are being assigned to our President. He believed them, he repeated them, and the buck stops with him.

I think the US should withdraw from Middle Eastern politics. I think we should slam the door as hard as we can. Then your world will be perfect - and so will ours.
Back to top
magpie
Idler
Idler


Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 454
Location: Essex, UK

PostPosted: Nov 27, 2006 2:20pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can't withdraw, you want oil.
Back to top
Mary
SearchIRC Admin
SearchIRC Admin


Joined: 03 May 2003
Posts: 692

PostPosted: Nov 27, 2006 3:41pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Magpie, do the research. ALL of Iraq's oil wells put together have a capacity of 82 billion barrels.

The US has fields containing about 40 billion barrels of crude oil and 1.0-1.2 trillion barrels of shale oil. Canada's largest oil field, Athabasca, is expected to produce an estimated 1,700 to 2,500 billion barrels. Mexico has 37 billion barrels.

Here's a math problem for you. If the US has 1,240,000,000,000 barrels of oil in the ground, and we consume 19.6 million barrels per day, how long will our own oil last before we have to take over countries and steal their oil?

1,240,000,000,000 / 19.6 = 63,265,306,122
(amt of oil in ground) / (used per day) = (days until we run out of oil)

63,265,306,122 / 365 = 173,329,605
(days we will have oil) / (days in year) = (years until we run out of oil)

The US buys oil on the open market, just like every other country. We're buying the cheapest available, and a portion of that comes from the Middle East. But we don't lack reserves of our own. In fact, our national strategic reserve is over three years of oil held in tanks around the country. When that runs out we can start pulling from ANWR and the Rockies and Appalachia and have enough to last until the sun goes nova. So come up with another excuse.
Back to top
magpie
Idler
Idler


Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 454
Location: Essex, UK

PostPosted: Nov 27, 2006 4:40pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Since when did I restrict my comment purely to Iraq?

Here's some crude oil reserve figures: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/reserves.html

I'm ignoring all the figures quoted for shale oil because those guestimates are even worse than those for crude - you also don't have the shale oil infrastructure to replace your dependence on crude in a short period of time. Thus you are still dependent on crude.

Reserves also aren't everything. It's production that counts. Here's some production figures: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/topworldtables1_2.html

Seems like you aren't producing enough oil, and you need to import some. That won't change overnight.

You'll also never be completely energy independent. Katrina is a good example of why not.

It's also all very well saying that you have the largest SPR in the world (or maybe the second largest), but the maximum you can withdraw per day is about one third of the number of barrels you consume.

Is this a good enough excuse? :)
Back to top
PingBad
Guru
Guru


Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 2026
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Nov 27, 2006 4:57pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hold the phone...

mregit wrote:
1,240,000,000,000 / 19.6 = 63,265,306,122
(amt of oil in ground) / (used per day) = (days until we run out of oil)

63,265,306,122 / 365 = 173,329,605
(days we will have oil) / (days in year) = (years until we run out of oil)
If the US has that much oil left, why the hell is petrol prices over here shooting through the roof?

It used to be 80c/L for unleaded petrol 14 years ago, now we have to fork out $1.50/L (in some places, $2/L)
Back to top
Mary
SearchIRC Admin
SearchIRC Admin


Joined: 03 May 2003
Posts: 692

PostPosted: Nov 27, 2006 7:05pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The oil shale deposits in the United States are the largest in the world.

Long before petroleum, people burned shale. It's a rock. It can be burned directly, like coal, or "cracked" to extract oil.

There really wasn't a large market for oil before the industrial revolution (late 1800's). Then, businesses needed machines and those machines needed oil. Geologists knew petroleum came squirting out of the ground in buckets, so they went looking and found it, mostly in Texas and in the Middle East. Shale was abandoned - why produce a costly inferior product when petroleum was plentiful, cheaper and easier to get?

If the price of a barrel of oil is under forty US dollars, shale oil is not competitive with crude oil. The low price of petroleum kept investors away from identifying shale oil deposits and developing ways to extract and refine the product. But now that the cost of oil is over $60 and shows no sign of declining, there is a renewed interest in shale.

Currently the best process forces superheated steam into the mine, and slowly, over 4 or 5 years, the shale separates into oil and gas and can be removed. The US strategic oil reserves have traditionally been three years supply (though I believe after Katrina and the development of Gulf offshore oil rigs and Athabasca that was reduced) precisely because that was estimated to be the time needed to ramp up US production.

Magpie, the US does not currently produce enough oil to cover our needs - the above explains why. Its like cooking dinner when you have a restaurant down the corner that sells delicious food cheaper than you can make it yourself. Why bother? I also think there's an element of strategy here... use up everyone else's oil before tapping into your own supply.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SearchIRC Forum Index -> Chat All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 8 of 9

 
 
Forum powered by phpBB
 
 © 2000 - 2008 EverythingIRC, Inc. All rights reserved. Please read our disclaimer