|
|
| Author |
Message |
Jason SearchIRC Developer

Joined: 03 May 2003 Posts: 1158 Location: Tampa, FL
|
Posted: Jul 21, 2003 6:13pm Post subject: /whois online feature now Online |
|
|
What are your opinions on the new /whois feature?
Try it out here: http://searchirc.com/whois.php
Post comments and suggestions here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iigor Newbie

Joined: 18 Jul 2003 Posts: 86 Location: Toronto, CA
|
Posted: Jul 21, 2003 9:21pm Post subject: |
|
|
everything seeems to be great :))
good job Jason! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest Guest
|
Posted: Jul 21, 2003 10:49pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It would be nice if the feature could attempt to look for non-exact matches, but of course that would require some sort of /who <someterm>* before the /whois process and probably wouldn't be worth it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
YonderBoY none

Joined: 21 Jul 2003 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Jul 22, 2003 2:28am Post subject: whois |
|
|
hi
it may be noob opinion but i think its good idea to add 1 more drop down box to whois... with all network u have on list so user can type nick and select network from list.
If that not slow your bots  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason SearchIRC Developer

Joined: 03 May 2003 Posts: 1158 Location: Tampa, FL
|
Posted: Jul 22, 2003 7:17am Post subject: |
|
|
| There are a lot of things that can be done, I don't want to rule anything out -- but I must mention that IRC servers have a method to download all publicly available channels -- they do NOT have a way to download all publicly available nicknames. Because of this, nicknames are a completely different animal than channels, and cannot be done instantly like channel searches. They must be done in real time. We're trying out a full whois, but will look into anything that is feasible, scalable and is useful to the end user. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
U Eleet

Joined: 18 Jun 2003 Posts: 521 Location: IRC
|
Posted: Jul 22, 2003 5:11pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doing this on every server-ouch, thats alot of bots and bandwith  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iigor Newbie

Joined: 18 Jul 2003 Posts: 86 Location: Toronto, CA
|
Posted: Jul 22, 2003 5:13pm Post subject: |
|
|
someday though the /whois feature will search all the nets
you always startout slowly  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ed SearchIRC Staff

Joined: 25 May 2003 Posts: 367 Location: Baton Rouge, LA
|
Posted: Jul 24, 2003 7:35pm Post subject: |
|
|
| iigor wrote: | someday though the /whois feature will search all the nets
you always startout slowly  |
With channels, you can simply get a full listing of all of the channels. For nicknames, you cannot - you must request information for each and every nickname. Your idea would be best accomplished by linking every network together. Heh. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iigor Newbie

Joined: 18 Jul 2003 Posts: 86 Location: Toronto, CA
|
Posted: Jul 24, 2003 9:14pm Post subject: |
|
|
| grrr... u are all too negative. At first, Jason thought it's impossible. Then i talked him into /whois idea. It started with 4 nets. Now it's about 10. Come on... !! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ed SearchIRC Staff

Joined: 25 May 2003 Posts: 367 Location: Baton Rouge, LA
|
Posted: Jul 24, 2003 9:30pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It still will never scale to all 800+ networks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason SearchIRC Developer

Joined: 03 May 2003 Posts: 1158 Location: Tampa, FL
|
Posted: Jul 24, 2003 9:34pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have designed it so it can scale, but scaling to accommodate more users means more whois robots per network.
Second thing is, each robot takes up a few megs of ram. Lets just imagine each robot takes up 2 megs of ram (they take up more than that, but lets just low ball the number for a second). 2 megs of ram times 800 networks = 1.6 gigs of ram, just to load the robots.
SearchIRC server has a total of 2 gigs of ram. So all networks isn't something that will happen in the near future. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iigor Newbie

Joined: 18 Jul 2003 Posts: 86 Location: Toronto, CA
|
Posted: Jul 24, 2003 9:39pm Post subject: |
|
|
but it's still possible.. all u need is some more money  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ed SearchIRC Staff

Joined: 25 May 2003 Posts: 367 Location: Baton Rouge, LA
|
Posted: Jul 24, 2003 10:21pm Post subject: |
|
|
| iigor wrote: | but it's still possible.. all u need is some more money  |
Donate to your heart's desire. Case Closed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
U Eleet

Joined: 18 Jun 2003 Posts: 521 Location: IRC
|
Posted: Jul 25, 2003 8:02am Post subject: |
|
|
heh, you think money grows on trees? Hes just talking ram. He hasn't even gone into the bandwith that would be required to have it on every network.
I don't know about you, but I only have 600 global. I think having him do this for my network at this point would be overkill. Maybe at 2500 global, but right now I don't feel I have enough users to be part of this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
YonderBoY none

Joined: 21 Jul 2003 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Jul 28, 2003 6:17am Post subject: whois |
|
|
hi
if we are talking about 800+ networks example its not meaning to make 800 bots, making bot only for most visited networks, I know its 2 hard i have been trying to make it with eggdrop socked bots but it not slow your ram it will kill your bandwith
for now whois is ok :arrow: |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|