|
|
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted: Apr 29, 2004 11:58am Post subject: Bahamut 1.4.36 friendly services? |
 |
|
anyone know of any dalnet style services avaliable for bahamut 1.4.36?
ive tried all of the ones i can find but none of them support this version. i get the error :
17:12] -irc.gridlockfm.co.uk- *** Global -- from services.gridlockfm.co.uk: PANIC! buffer = :irc.gridlockfm.co.uk SJOIN 1083262318 #jo + :@skandal
-
[17:12] -irc.gridlockfm.co.uk- *** Global -- from services.gridlockfm.co.uk: Live Long and Prosper - Time to go Hold me please! I dont want to leave! buaaa!
-
[17:12] -irc.gridlockfm.co.uk- *** Routing -- from irc.gridlockfm.co.uk: Received SQUIT services.gridlockfm.co.uk from services.gridlockfm.co.uk[unknown@0.0.0.0] (Services terminating: Segmentation fault)
-
[17:12] -irc.gridlockfm.co.uk- *** Notice -- services.gridlockfm.co.uk was connected for 31 seconds. 0/2 sendK/recvK. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
uchat
Idler
Joined: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 335
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Apr 30, 2004 12:51am Post subject: |
|
|
ok well ive sorted half the error.. i changed the ircd i was using to an older version and services now seem to stay.
Now the problem is they dont 'do' anything, i can register a nick but after setting the enforce and set kill on it doesnt give them 60 seconds to change, after a channel is registered nothing happens, no +rtn or akicks or +o by chanserv.. rootserv 'access denied' even when i identify to the services master nick.. im using bahamut 1.4.33 and sirv2.9.0 - ive tried other services and they are the same... any ideas what im doing wrong here? services are 'there' and responding, but just being a bit lazy really.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
uchat
Idler
Joined: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 335
|
| Posted: Apr 30, 2004 3:53am Post subject: |
|
|
make sure you have a U:Line for Services
IF your serious about running an IRC network, you should choose a set of Services that are being developed (sirv is not, at least last I heard) or find yourself a coder to keep up with todays ever changing IRC technology. I personally recommend Anope http://www.anope.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Apr 30, 2004 5:27am Post subject: |
|
|
yes theres a U:Line for services..
i was using sirv as it has rootserv, what other services offer rootserv aswell as operserv ns cs etc etc |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Horizon
Lurker
Joined: 10 May 2003
Posts: 145
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
uchat
Idler
Joined: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 335
|
| Posted: Apr 30, 2004 2:46pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
yes theres a U:Line for services..
i was using sirv as it has rootserv, what other services offer rootserv aswell as operserv ns cs etc etc
|
Most have either RS or OS, very few have both. In fact I really don't see a need for both, however Cygnus does, it's found at http://www.habber.net/services but Cygnus is slow to update and is nearly a dead project as well.
If I may .. why would you need both OS and RS? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ashen
Idler
Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 285
|
| Posted: May 01, 2004 8:36am Post subject: |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: | ok well ive sorted half the error.. i changed the ircd i was using to an older version and services now seem to stay.
Now the problem is they dont 'do' anything, i can register a nick but after setting the enforce and set kill on it doesnt give them 60 seconds to change, after a channel is registered nothing happens, no +rtn or akicks or +o by chanserv.. rootserv 'access denied' even when i identify to the services master nick.. im using bahamut 1.4.33 and sirv2.9.0 - ive tried other services and they are the same... any ideas what im doing wrong here? services are 'there' and responding, but just being a bit lazy really.. |
make sure you're oper'ed up too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rakaur
none
Joined: 09 Feb 2004
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: May 02, 2004 6:11pm Post subject: |
|
|
| .36 completely bastardized the protocol by trying to add sid+uid systems. It didn't turn out too pretty. I don't know how well the backwards compatibility works. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Monosex
none
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 14
|
| Posted: May 04, 2004 7:30am Post subject: |
|
|
| rakaur wrote: | | .36 completely bastardized the protocol by trying to add sid+uid systems. It didn't turn out too pretty. I don't know how well the backwards compatibility works. |
Well i'm using 1.4.36 with ircservices 5.0.31 and have no problems at all. I know that it works with anope, too.
edit:
bahamut 1.4.36 doesn't have sid+uid, it's a part of 1.6 branch (no longer developed) and is in TODO for future versions of 1.8, which will be released in a week or so.
m. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Register
Log in
